Descartes :: essays research papers

From Descartes perspective, nature is a representationof God therefore, God must intrinsically exist, inasmuch as he, too, is a product of His own creation. Descartes wasone of many philosophers who fully supported this argumentin support of Gods existence, contending that the externalworld is the ruling force behind the straw man of all beings. Descartes assertions, as portrayed within the literaryboundaries of Meditations on First Philosophy, were foundednot in cosmological or ontological arguments but rather inteleological debate, inasmuch as the philosopher believedthat there has to be an omnipotent entity responsible forall the purpose and order that is found within naturalexistence and, thereby, stimulating a sense of wonder aboutthe world.One of the primary reasons why Meditation III bringsforth such a sense of wonder is because Descartesphilosophical belles-lettres followed a very distinctive trail,one that pursued a path of purity and sincerity. Hebelieved deeply in the v alue of ethics as it colligate tohumans within the natural world, and his concept of formingan adequate ethical code was thought to be the only way inwhich people could truly give their value system. Withinthis natural world of which he spoke, Descartes theorizedthat knowledge was the ultimate controller of theenvironment, thus supporting the teleological argument asproof of God. He persevered and postulated as to how hecould at last seal the overwhelming gap that existed betweenthought and bodily process. It was through his writings thatDescartes exercised the possibility that all thought andaction are interconnected, bringing to mind the view ofscience and how it undoubtedly demonstrated the sameevidence.Characteristic of humanitys constant quest for theconcept of Gods existence, the journey of understanding has answer to represent myriad things to myriad people, ultimatelyrendering any universal explanation virtually impossible. The problem with such sought-after meaning is at tempting tosuccessfully complete a single yet comprehensive connotationto its concept however, this cannot be achieved as long asany two individuals harbor decidedly oppositeinterpretations. "I shall now close my eyes, I shall stopmy ears, I shall call away all my senses, I shall effaceeven from my thoughts all the images of corporeal things, orat least (for that is hardly possible) I shall esteem themas vain and false and thus holding converse only withmyself and considering my own nature, I shall enterprise little bylittle to reach a better knowledge of and a more familiaracquaintanceship with myself" (Descartes PG).Inasmuch as Descartes provides a naturalistic openingfor Gods existence, which is based upon human naturesphilosophical reasoning, this form of mitigated convictionis what essentially supports his stance on Gods existence